Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756021AbYKPA7V (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:59:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752230AbYKPA7J (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:59:09 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:46983 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751662AbYKPA7I (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:59:08 -0500 Message-ID: <491F704A.3010201@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:58:50 -0500 From: Rik van Riel Organization: Red Hat, Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080915) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KOSAKI Motohiro CC: LKML , linux-mm , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Gene Heskett Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: evict streaming IO cache first References: <20081115181748.3410.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20081115181748.3410.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 27 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I think we need this patch at 2.6.28. I agree. I thought we would need this patch from right before the time I wrote it, but we had no good workload to demonstrate it at the time. Gene Heskett found that the problem happens on his system and the patch fixes is. > Can this thinking get acception? One of the reasons that I could not find a justification for the patch is that all the benchmarks that I tried were unaffected by it. This makes me believe that the risk of performance regressions is low, while the patch does fix a real performance bug for Gene's desktop. -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/