Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:58:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:58:22 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:63759 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:58:04 -0500 Subject: Re: The IBM order relaxation patch To: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 00:18:47 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Ulrich Weigand" at Feb 06, 2002 10:50:29 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >with a GPF flag? What they describe does not happen in an > >interrupt context, so we can sleep. > > Because nobody even *tries* to free adjacent pages to build up > a free order-2 area. You could wait really long ... Without the rmap patch you can't easily do it > rmap method could help here, because with reverse mappings we > can at least try to free adjacent areas (because we then at least > *know* who's using the pages). rmap definitely makes it a real no brainer to do this at least for small clusters of pages. Doing large chunks gets progressively harder - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/