Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752757AbYKQSt0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:49:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751468AbYKQStK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:49:10 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.227]:41554 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbYKQStJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:49:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QEnR8PvZwxgfxGWm0mHYNEFZR4jC2oWagAGFoxdMNdXW82MNfo8wFfLr/dplpe2FuL fkWs5TJLgMBTAQtV6kgZ8AKPiUw57LgC+33vyW4MqPnJwDe0RqffpxQ7BHtbIPXNtvKf zfXIawde5yI1RBY4jeAVvhE5ZgGbL/90zRC24= Message-ID: <3aaafc130811171049l473fbc60h36ba26f048ac986f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:49:08 -0500 From: "J.R. Mauro" To: "Shem Multinymous" Subject: Re: [Tpctl-users] Inclusion of tp_smapi module into kernel? Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , tpctl-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <41840b750811171035w63c794aepaa273bc55fbaf2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200811171455.50039.hanno@hboeck.de> <49219DF5.5040404@zytor.com> <3aaafc130811170913o761ce43fg3a2738586ebd2396@mail.gmail.com> <41840b750811171035w63c794aepaa273bc55fbaf2@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1097 Lines: 24 On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Shem Multinymous wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:13 PM, J.R. Mauro wrote: >> There are several utilities maintained by this author, and finding >> some way to merge the code has been tried more than once. If you look >> back far enough, Andrew asked to have another of the project's members >> sign off on the patch, and maybe that would be acceptable enough, but >> afaik the author has never responded directly to that idea. > > We've discussed that in private at the time, and recently on LKML too. > In summary: > I'm fine with that, and so is everybody I talked to (including Linus), > except Greg KH who vetoed it since he believes the code is irrevocably > and contagiously evil. Does Greg know that both Linus and Andrew have ok'd a second signoff? > > Shem > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/