Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753316AbYKQSvQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:51:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751876AbYKQSvA (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:51:00 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35324 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751657AbYKQSu7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:50:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:50:50 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro cc: Peter Palfrader , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fix broken ownership of /proc/sys/ files In-Reply-To: <20081117040645.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <20081116205922.GI28958@anguilla.noreply.org> <20081116221910.GQ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20081117040645.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1444 Lines: 33 On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Al Viro wrote: > > > > We already initialize a _lot_ of fields, including fields that most > > filesystem would likely end up re-initializing when reading an inode (like > > i_size and i_nlink). Maybe it would be more sensible to initialize > > i_gid/uid there too, when we are guaranteed to have that cacheline dirty > > anyway (because we're initializing everything around those fields). > > *nod* > > It certainly makes sense to do it in a uniform way - there's enough > users of new_inode() that want exactly that. I'll do that as soon > as I get from under a huge pile of pending mail ;-/ Ok. I think zeroing i_mode might be a good idea too. Just to make sure.. > ObPendingStuff: would you mind a series of section annotations? That's > a bunch of trivial one-liners and it kills the section noise - the remaining > ones are few and tricky. It had sat around in my tree for several weeks > and I can certainly carry it until the next cycle, but OTOH this stuff > *is* trivial and the noise is annoying as hell. Yeah, it would be good to get rid of at least the bulk of the section warnings. A lot of them have historically been 100% real problems. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/