Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:22:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:22:31 -0500 Received: from [208.147.64.186] ([208.147.64.186]:18677 "HELO warden3.diginsite.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:21:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:55:02 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang To: Daniel Egger cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please add me to the kernel change distribution list In-Reply-To: <1013024988.27753.28.camel@sonja> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org this is not a linux vs. windows issue. it's an issue of paranoid firewall companies not allowing unknown stuff through. I am behind a Raptor firewall running on Solaris that has the same problem. the first new version of the software that has been released since the ECN stuff went from proposal to draft was released last week and does support this. it will take some time for everyone to migrate to new versions of software. and I for one would not want firewall vendors to program their firewalls to allow all proposed standard changes through them. expecting firewalls to allow stuff the day it is accepted into draft status is not reasonable either. yes firewalls need to be updated to reflect changes in the standards, but these updates should be able to happen as part of the normal development/release cycle. David Lang On 6 Feb 2002, Daniel Egger wrote: > Date: 06 Feb 2002 20:49:48 +0100 > From: Daniel Egger > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Please add me to the kernel change distribution list > > Am Mit, 2002-02-06 um 17.45 schrieb Matti Aarnio: > > > Can't. COMPAQ is one of those companies which have covered their > > incoming email systems with firewalls rejecting connections with IP- > > header option bits that were "reserved, set to zero when sending" for > > first about 20 years, but which now got other specification. > > (The firewall makers made an error and tought it to mean: "reserved, > > must forever be zero".) > > I had been once behind one of their firewalls and it's like hell on > earth; Even trivial actions like ssh'ing somewhere or getting the > kernel sources caused problems. Maybe Compaq should reconsider their > security policy and work more with Linux instead of Windows to get a > clue. > > -- > Servus, > Daniel > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/