Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752455AbYKRC3c (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:29:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751835AbYKRC3X (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:29:23 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:62927 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751792AbYKRC3W (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:29:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:29:20 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: LKML cc: Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Large stack usage in fs code (especially for PPC64) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 22 On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Note, I was using a default config that had CONFIG_IRQSTACKS off and > > CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES on. > > Here's my stack after boot up with CONFIG_IRQSTACKS set. Seems that > softirqs still use the same stack as the process. > By-the-way, my box has been running stable ever since I switched to CONFIG_IRQSTACKS. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/