Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:23:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:23:39 -0500 Received: from ip68-3-104-241.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.3.104.241]:11441 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:23:27 -0500 Message-ID: <3C620131.9090606@candelatech.com> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:23:13 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion Badulescu CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Friesen Subject: Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporting In-Reply-To: <200202070151.g171p4h11574@moisil.badula.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>From the limited testing I just ran, I appears that starfire and 3c59x > handle this correctly, whereas tulip always loses a small number of > packets during a UDP storm. ttcp -us[rt] is very useful for such > testing... It would be interesting to see which side is dropping? Have you coorelated ethernet driver counters to your sendto count? > > Ion > > -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/