Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750844AbYKRSLs (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:11:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750928AbYKRSLj (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:11:39 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:59831 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750766AbYKRSLj (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:11:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:09:51 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: next-20081114: WARNING: at block/blk-barrier.c:246 blk_do_ordered() Message-ID: <20081118180951.GF26308@kernel.dk> References: <20081115160739.GA26778@kernel.dk> <20081117180604.GV26778@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3267 Lines: 65 On Tue, Nov 18 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > 2008/11/18 Alexander Beregalov : > > 2008/11/17 Jens Axboe : > >> On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > >>> 2008/11/15 Alexander Beregalov : > >>> > 2008/11/15 Jens Axboe : > >>> >> On Fri, Nov 14 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > >>> >>> WARNING: at block/blk-barrier.c:246 blk_do_ordered+0x22b/0x26a() > >>> >>> Modules linked in: > >>> >>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-rc4-next-20081114 #3 > >>> >>> Call Trace: > >>> >>> [] warn_on_slowpath+0x58/0x7d > >>> >>> [] ? mark_lock+0x1c/0x37a > >>> >>> [] ? elv_rb_del+0x30/0x4b > >>> >>> [] ? cfq_remove_request+0x180/0x1d8 > >>> >>> [] ? __cfq_slice_expired+0xd6/0xeb > >>> >>> [] ? cfq_slice_expired+0x19/0x1b > >>> >>> [] ? cfq_dispatch_requests+0x2c1/0x37e > >>> >>> [] blk_do_ordered+0x22b/0x26a > >>> >>> [] elv_next_request+0x1d0/0x210 > >>> >>> [] scsi_request_fn+0x9e/0x539 > >>> >>> [] ? put_lock_stats+0xe/0x27 > >>> >>> [] blk_invoke_request_fn+0x3b/0x6e > >>> >>> [] __blk_run_queue+0x25/0x29 > >>> >>> [] blk_run_queue+0x21/0x35 > >>> >>> [] scsi_run_queue+0x2cf/0x379 > >>> >>> [] scsi_next_command+0x36/0x46 > >>> >>> [] scsi_end_request+0x92/0xa4 > >>> >>> [] scsi_io_completion+0x1a7/0x3ad > >>> >>> [] scsi_finish_command+0xe9/0xf2 > >>> >>> [] scsi_softirq_done+0x10e/0x117 > >>> >>> [] blk_done_softirq+0x7f/0x8f > >>> >>> [] __do_softirq+0x70/0x101 > >>> >>> [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 > >>> >>> [] do_softirq+0x39/0x8a > >>> >>> [] irq_exit+0x45/0xa2 > >>> >>> [] do_IRQ+0x16a/0x19c > >>> >>> [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf > >>> >>> [] ? mwait_idle+0x3e/0x48 > >>> >>> [] ? mwait_idle+0x35/0x48 > >>> >>> [] ? cpu_idle+0x51/0xba > >>> >>> [] ? rest_init+0x70/0x72 > >>> >>> ---[ end trace 115cb4be7e150bb9 ]--- > >>> >> > >>> >> I'm assuming this is new with -next and doesn't happen with 2.6.28-rc4? > >>> > Yes. > >>> >> Is it reproducible in -next? > >>> > I have seen it only once yet. > >>> > >>> I have the same warning on 2.6.28-rc5-next-20081117, reproducible on dbench. > > Bisected down to 70bfe2de81b32969db1b4939bf171bbe55bcf1ef > > "elevator prevent flushing small requests to device" > forget: revert fixes it. That was my main culprit, thanks a lot for testing and taking the time to bisect! I'll take a look at it and probably ask you to test a patch. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/