Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754225AbYKSSSZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:18:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753287AbYKSSSQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:18:16 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:52839 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752906AbYKSSSP (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:18:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:17:44 +0000 From: Russell King To: Rusty Russell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Travis , ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, starvik@axis.com, tony.luck@intel.com, takata@linux-m32r.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, grundler@parisc-linux.org, paulus@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, lethal@linux-sh.org, wli@holomorphy.com, davem@davemloft.net, jdike@addtoit.com, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpumask: centralize cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map Message-ID: <20081119181743.GA31357@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200811200107.18162.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200811200107.18162.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1174 Lines: 32 On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 01:07:16AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > diff -r c8ab7f6fc5e8 kernel/cpu.c > --- a/kernel/cpu.c Fri Oct 31 10:48:30 2008 +1100 > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c Fri Oct 31 11:22:29 2008 +1100 > @@ -24,19 +24,20 @@ cpumask_t cpu_present_map __read_mostly; > cpumask_t cpu_present_map __read_mostly; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map); > > -#ifndef CONFIG_SMP > - > /* > * Represents all cpu's that are currently online. > */ > -cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL; > +cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly; Just a question: in the uniprocessor case, does this mean that cpu_online_map becomes zero or do we mark cpu0 as online somewhere? I couldn't see it in this patch. I'm just wondering from a review point of view whether this change of initialization could have undesirable side effects. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/