Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755105AbYKSV1d (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:27:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755040AbYKSV0U (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:26:20 -0500 Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]:48502 "EHLO victor.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755229AbYKSV0R (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:26:17 -0500 Message-ID: <49248560.1020501@novell.com> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:30:08 -0500 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitri Sivanich CC: Max Krasnyansky , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: RT sched: cpupri_vec lock contention with def_root_domain and no load balance References: <20081103210748.GC9937@sgi.com> <1225751603.7803.1640.camel@twins> <490FC735.1070405@novell.com> <49105D84.8070108@novell.com> <1225809393.7803.1669.camel@twins> <20081104144017.GB30855@sgi.com> <4910634C.1020207@novell.com> <49246DD0.3010509@qualcomm.com> <4924762B.8000108@novell.com> <20081119203340.GC2383@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20081119203340.GC2383@sgi.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D8195319 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig78BE9FC0641A7C88E3FF2FAF" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2010 Lines: 56 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig78BE9FC0641A7C88E3FF2FAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dimitri Sivanich wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 03:25:15PM -0500, Gregory Haskins wrote: > =20 >> It sounds like the problem with my code is that "null sched domain" >> translates into "default root-domain" which is understandably unexpect= ed >> by Dimitri (and myself). Really I intended root-domains to become >> associated with each exclusive/disjoint cpuset that is created. In a >> way, non-balanced/isolated cpus could be modeled as an exclusive cpuse= t >> with one member, but that is somewhat beyond the scope of the >> =20 > > Actually, at one time, that is how things were setup. Setting the > cpu_exclusive bit on a single cpu cpuset would isolate that cpu from > load balancing. > =20 Do you know if this was pre or post the root-domain code? Here is a reference to the commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dco= mmit;h=3D57d885fea0da0e9541d7730a9e1dcf734981a173 A bisection that shows when this last worked for you would be very appreciated if you have the time, Dimitri. Regards, -Greg --------------enig78BE9FC0641A7C88E3FF2FAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkkhWAACgkQlOSOBdgZUxmbkgCghFJthdhcF4AiuJ7JzqjNYLdA YZ4AnA1M0m2Kd2/7Pmux8M7edxKyzKB+ =PxmA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig78BE9FC0641A7C88E3FF2FAF-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/