Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S287276AbSBGK6v>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 05:58:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S287283AbSBGK6l>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 05:58:41 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:20484 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S287276AbSBGK6j>; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 05:58:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Please add me to the kernel change distribution list
To: dlang@diginsite.com (David Lang)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 11:07:50 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: degger@fhm.edu (Daniel Egger), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202061350030.26707-100000@dlang.diginsite.com> from "David Lang" at Feb 06, 2002 01:55:02 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16YmP8-0008K8-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> and I for one would not want firewall vendors to program their firewalls
> to allow all proposed standard changes through them. expecting firewalls
> to allow stuff the day it is accepted into draft status is not reasonable
> either.

The firewall vendor was wrong. Period. There was no guarantee that the bits
they were rejecting on were not going to change. 

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/