Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753684AbYKSWcV (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:32:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751308AbYKSWcL (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:32:11 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f11.google.com ([209.85.217.11]:52536 "EHLO mail-gx0-f11.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750695AbYKSWcK (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:32:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=h4SLkGlxE0/NLlm/KvTL1FzDpIbveXeMz9ODJabe/wuHau3m26jPPhM2Vqax86ouxZ DH3vfQ/pEhwQm2KnbNlRHGUh6THpE1xtzSRVEyDLIlC9kV2jh0hoafK9YbpWCXP+lCjC v1fAiBYhKTvnarBh59+GVfs9qCa34Frk2zu74= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:32:04 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fredrik_Markstr=F6m?=" To: "Lennart Sorensen" Subject: Re: Developing non-commercial drivers ? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20081119183809.GF5682@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081119183809.GF5682@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> X-Google-Sender-Auth: fbb211cb38cd756c Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 40 Well, who knows ? If you read my email carefully enough you should see that that is not the question or issue here. This was my first question to this list ever and I'm impressed with the good and constructive answers I've gotten, but I really do not understand the purpose of your response. /Fredrik On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:16:44PM +0100, Fredrik Markstr?m wrote: > > Linus, others... > > > > I'm working for as a consultant for a large hardware company porting > > Linux to their new cpu-architecture and everything is pretty much > > up and running. Now they want us to develop a closed-source (to > > protect their IP) ethernet driver for their proprietary Ethernet MAC. > > Ethernet MACs are a commodity these days. Who is dumb enough to think > their ethernet MAC needs to be protected these days? > > You make an ethernet MAC... good for you. You have not invented > anything new and amazing that needs protecting. Really. Get over it, > you are not that special. :) > > > My question is: Is there a fair way to do this and still comply to > > the intent and spirit of the Linux licensing ? > > > > If yes, how ? > > Probably not, but I think the real issue is the previous one. > > -- > Len Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/