Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753879AbYKTFiP (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:38:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752775AbYKTFh5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:37:57 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1307 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752623AbYKTFh4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:37:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:37:47 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Matt Carlson Cc: Roger Heflin , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , netdev Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:219 dev_watchdog+0xfe/0x17e() with tg3 network Message-ID: <20081120053746.GB15168@1wt.eu> References: <491954E1.2050002@gmail.com> <1226403067.7685.1598.camel@twins> <491E49AA.60407@gmail.com> <20081118065006.GC24654@1wt.eu> <20081120031101.GD26448@xw6200.broadcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081120031101.GD26448@xw6200.broadcom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1555 Lines: 35 Hello Matt, On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 07:11:01PM -0800, Matt Carlson wrote: > > My tg3 is just PCI-based, no PCIe in this beast. I can send more > > info when I turn it on. I don't think that the tg3 driver changes > > often, so most likely digging through the changes between 2.6.25 > > and 2.6.27 should not take much time. I just don't know if I can > > reliably reproduce the issue right now. > > Willy, this problem description sounds a little different than the > original report. There was a bug where the driver would wait 2.5 > seconds for a firmware event that would never get serviced. That > fix has already landed in the 2.6.27 tree though. > > I glanced over the changes between 2.6.25 and 2.6.27.6. There are quite > a few changes related to phylib support for an upcoming device, but not > so many changes that affect older devices. What device are you using? I think it's a 5704, but I will check this this morning when I'm at work. I also want to try to reliably reproduce the problem. After that, I see only 29 patches which differ from the two kernels, it should be pretty easy to spot the culprit. If you think it's a different bug than original report (though I really thought it was the same), I'll post my findings in a separate thread not to mix investigations. Thanks, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/