Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756150AbYKTRYk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:24:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753843AbYKTRYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:24:31 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:56455 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753348AbYKTRYb (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:24:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:06 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alexander van Heukelum Cc: LKML , Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jan Beulich , Glauber Costa , Matt Mackall , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: clean up after: move entry_64.S register saving out of the macros Message-ID: <20081120172406.GA18794@elte.hu> References: <1226845741-12470-2-git-send-email-heukelum@fastmail.fm> <20081117175232.GA13766@mailshack.com> <20081119001811.GA23237@mailshack.com> <20081120134011.GA3627@mailshack.com> <20081120150412.GC13550@elte.hu> <20081120152601.GA3953@mailshack.com> <20081120153954.GA22511@elte.hu> <20081120155744.GA4130@mailshack.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081120155744.GA4130@mailshack.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE RBL: Envelope sender in blackholes.securitysage.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 22 * Alexander van Heukelum wrote: > Does not work... But if you are attached to the underscores, I think > we can force it to work by using CPP to convert it to something the > assembler does parse right: > > #define pushq_cfi pushq.cfi > > etc? > > Or is that just too ugly? changed it to pushq.cfi / popq.cfi / movq.cfi - does that read OK to you? It looks fine here. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/