Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757515AbYKTWGI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:06:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756071AbYKTWFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:05:54 -0500 Received: from smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.64.95]:20653 "HELO smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755993AbYKTWFx (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:05:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=XW4spw3BTTtWbdkHBBgA/fnXtCYbrD4B2PDlqnEdMDJxJ1r+2H/lwDdyY7lppH6O59R6RBn4fYT1GvbznAd9qbwKd2bCbxBJ6LWjTsfD/B4AOsBhTK2u8ofYfKiWLKMKXvITY6bZOVi08yREwaLtCGkEs/5ygRj3pIkr/0Fho/g= ; X-YMail-OSG: HGi1dMoVM1mWxLDQGp7SyWOYlGEt0HdAw.Ana_aE2Allt2bikb4y6gtChiKkYwjKAWA9Gvl6LucXDbHde4h21Hq6AQhIAZkxGu3gwasy2zS.gnbrd5LDrt.y9a9s4mLKdDj7tFrEwRJv8yoPg8v2sDYr X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: David Brownell To: Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.28-rc5] regulator: enable/disable refcounting Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:05:51 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: lkml , Mark Brown References: <200811161144.46582.david-b@pacbell.net> <200811191412.41259.david-b@pacbell.net> <1227218280.585.40.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1227218280.585.40.camel@vega.slimlogic.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811201405.51671.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 868 Lines: 26 On Thursday 20 November 2008, Liam Girdwood wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 14:12 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Liam Girdwood wrote: > > > Both -rc5 patches applied. > > > > How about the other two which seemed non-controversial? > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122645403604873&w=2 (code shrink) > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122645416305013&w=2 (attribute shrink) > > > > Those were sent against RC4. > > Both applied. Great! Now, I think I have some comments from Mark to respond to ... He seems to be saying a new regulator_ops method is needed. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/