Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753332AbYKUDPn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:15:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752773AbYKUDPR (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:15:17 -0500 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:50989 "EHLO mail.wrs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752585AbYKUDPQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:15:16 -0500 From: Liming Wang To: Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/1] function tracing: fix wrong position computing of stack_trace Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:00:17 +0800 Message-Id: <1227236418-6023-1-git-send-email-liming.wang@windriver.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.6.0.3 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Nov 2008 03:15:00.0686 (UTC) FILETIME=[56DE7EE0:01C94B87] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 18 Hi Steven and Ingo, Before I have submitted a patch to fix output of available_filter_functions, later I checked other places that use seq_operations, I found stack_trace also has this potential problem. This fix use a more sane method to implement seq_operations. And this avoids checking return value of seq_printf. If you think this implementation is OK, I think others can be convert to this cleaner way, which will make future usage of seq_operations less errors. walimis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/