Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758779AbYKWOMv (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:12:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758027AbYKWOMm (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:12:42 -0500 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.191]:37154 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901AbYKWOMl (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:12:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=KAbzpYYcnDD6rqEBIH1PUqFYhMQ4k59R/Sfm8FhgEyNxBzKV4BaUwxNIAYcnfYgpkm NOMl1o3VuisYV7guJ28RIS9qOqOHRDIibXnPxDtwehKKnXYHsGU9BzDNFP2skIrAsThj KyuBfk3WyTz3qc7Hwt2tiuJNhhlSOJ3TofrdE= Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:12:37 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Ingo Molnar , Alexander van Heukelum , LKML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jan Beulich , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: KPROBE_ENTRY should be paired wth KPROBE_END Message-ID: <20081123141237.GI24818@localhost> References: <20081120152601.GA3953@mailshack.com> <20081120153954.GA22511@elte.hu> <20081121154155.GA12999@mailshack.com> <20081121154318.GA13014@mailshack.com> <20081121154428.GB13014@mailshack.com> <20081121160629.GA24839@elte.hu> <20081123090828.GA31490@mailshack.com> <20081123091532.GA31515@mailshack.com> <20081123132752.GF1178@elte.hu> <20081123135134.GH24818@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081123135134.GH24818@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2811 Lines: 90 [Cyrill Gorcunov - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 04:51:34PM +0300] | [Ingo Molnar - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 02:27:52PM +0100] | | | | * Alexander van Heukelum wrote: | | | | > Impact: moves some code out of .kprobes.text | | > | | > KPROBE_ENTRY switches code generation to .kprobes.text, and KPROBE_END | | > uses .popsection to get back to the previous section (.text, normally). | | > Also replace ENDPROC by END, for consistency. | | > | | > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum | | | | applied to tip/x86/irq, thanks Alexander! | | | | > One more small change for today. The xen-related functions | | > xen_do_hypervisor_callback and xen_failsafe_callback are put | | > in the .kprobes.text even in the current kernel: ignore_sysret | | > is enclosed in KPROBE_ENTRY / ENDPROC, instead of KPROBE_ENTRY / | | > KPROBE_END, but I guess the situation is harmless. | | | | yeah. It narrows no-kprobes protection for that code, but it should | | indeed be fine (and that's the intention as well). | | | | Note that this is a reoccuring bug type, and rather long-lived. Can | | you think of any way to get automated nesting protection of both the | | .cfi_startproc/endproc macros and kprobes start/end? A poor man's | | solution would be to grep the number of start and end methods and | | enforce that they are equal. | | | | Ingo | | | | I think we could play with preprocessor and check if ENTRY/END matches. | Looking now. | | - Cyrill - Here is what I've done 1) Add some macros like: .macro __set_entry .set _ENTRY_IN, 1 .endm .macro __unset_entry .set _ENTRY_IN, 0 .endm .macro __check_entry .ifeq _ENTRY_IN .error "END should be used" .abort .endif .endm So the code ENTRY(mcount) __unset_entry retq __check_entry END(mcount) will fail like cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o CHK include/linux/version.h CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86 CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh AS arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:84: Error: END should be used arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:84: Fatal error: .abort detected. Abandoning ship. make[1]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o] Error 1 make: *** [arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.o] Error 2 cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ So if such an approach is acceptable (in general) -- I could take a more deeper look. So every ENTRY would check if other ENTRY/KPROBE is active and report that. - Cyrill - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/