Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755419AbYKWSn4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:43:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751944AbYKWSnq (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:43:46 -0500 Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.226]:28027 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751776AbYKWSnp (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:43:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=akzZaM6c5TbfnmVWK80b67LSfDX1lCPXZtgO6mMuxVL+nLp7to9a34zmyxci1QUBvb ANXdNKs3N9vhT8jAUq5B5ufMT+ib9U/JLw8swAlaGkFL3RNzK8ULHRjQMCuzgGLo4YZv OKyM8sDq5GDtzngm4LJ1GYMUPmgYxQvfQ7ZZw= Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:43:44 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Sam Ravnborg , Ingo Molnar , Alexander van Heukelum , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: [RFC -tip] x86: introduce ENTRY(KPROBE)_X86 assembly helpers to catch unbalanced declaration Message-ID: <20081123184344.GJ12710@localhost> References: <20081123165711.GA12710@localhost> <20081123175125.GA32472@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081123175846.GF12710@localhost> <20081123181248.GA338@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20081123182103.GH12710@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081123182103.GH12710@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1438 Lines: 36 [Cyrill Gorcunov - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 09:21:03PM +0300] | [Sam Ravnborg - Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100] | ... | | > | | > I don't have -next tree on my laptop, neither cross-compile tools but | | > if someone could test it -- it would be great. But I used gas macros | | > here -- i doubt other architectures has the same syntax. At least | | > PDP-11 would beat us with ';' symbol :) | | | | If we include this in any of the 100+ trees that Stephen sucks | | into -next we will get it tried out. | | | | Ingo has so and so does others so getting it into -next | | is rather easy. Then the automated builds will tell of if | | it fails on any of the toolchains used there. | | | | Sam | | | | Sam, to be clear, you mean that I could put this stuff into general | include/linux/linkage.h with general names as ENTRY/END and the same | for KPROBE so it could be merged into -next tree for testing? If yes, | that as I said there will be a lot of errors so build will stuck in | a moment 'cause of unbalanced ENTRY. Not sure if it's a good idea :) | | - Cyrill - Did I understand you right? It's highly possible I could translate message the wrong way somime. - Cyrill - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/