Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:38:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:38:37 -0500 Received: from mushroom.netcomsystems.com ([12.9.24.195]:65368 "EHLO exch-connector.netcomsystems.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:37:47 -0500 Message-ID: <9384475DFC05D2118F9C00805F6F263107ECA812@exchange1.netcomsystems.com> From: "Perches, Joe" To: "'root@chaos.analogic.com'" Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'Alan Cox'" Subject: RE: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:37:41 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org How does one guarantee a packet socket send/sendto/write? -----Original Message----- From: Richard B. Johnson [mailto:root@chaos.analogic.com] > > That is correct UDP behaviour > Do you think this is the correct PacketSocket/RAW behaviour? Yes. > How does one guarantee a send/sendto/write? Easy, you use send() or write(). These work on stream protocol TCP/IP where there is a "connection". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/