Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:53:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:53:25 -0500 Received: from dsl-213-023-038-235.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.38.235]:50577 "EHLO starship.berlin") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:53:09 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, Robert Love Subject: Re: [RFC] New locking primitive for 2.5 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:57:35 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com, Martin Wirth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@zip.com.au, torvalds@transmet.com, mingo@elte.hu, nigel@nrg.org In-Reply-To: <3C629F91.2869CB1F@dlr.de> <1013113285.11659.84.camel@phantasy> <20020207133602.C21935@hq.fsmlabs.com> In-Reply-To: <20020207133602.C21935@hq.fsmlabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On February 7, 2002 09:36 pm, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > > P.S. If this is going to turn into another priority-inheritance flame, I > > am stopping here. Let's take it off-list or just drop it, please. I'd > > much prefer to discuss the current combilock issue which is at hand. ;) > > It's the same issue. Not necessarily, look at Ingo's observation about replacing semaphores with combi-locks as opposed to replacing spinlocks with combi-locks. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/