Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:56:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:55:48 -0500 Received: from 1Cust15.tnt15.sfo3.da.uu.net ([67.218.75.15]:4365 "EHLO morrowfield.home") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:55:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:02:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200202080102.RAA09003@morrowfield.home> From: Tom Lord To: phillips@bonn-fries.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (message from Daniel Phillips on Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:23:00 +0100) Subject: Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing In-Reply-To: <20020207165035.GA28384@ravel.coda.cs.cmu.edu> <200202072306.PAA08272@morrowfield.home> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Noted. Yours would seem to be the more popular opinion. I don't feel strongly against changing it. -t On February 8, 2002 12:06 am, Tom Lord wrote: > The name has curly braces so that it sorts reasonably (i.e. away from > ordinary source files). It is not a dot file so that you can > recognize at a glance when you are looking at the root of a project > tree. I'd pass on that to get rid of the extra 'noise'. If for some reason I'm not sure - and I consider that unlikely to ever occur - I can always ls .* or find -name ".*arch*" if I'm really confused. I like my directories to look clean, *especially* the source root. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/