Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752675AbYKYHWR (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:22:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751287AbYKYHWF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:22:05 -0500 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.184]:25490 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750823AbYKYHWC (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:22:02 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent:from; b=no4J3b+a/ffcdBMF6sS9cLdGiRbVH2D1EYkuPClg9gEX3HPKGEvSC6H6rQgx3l6G1J P3OrVjIqoTonQs01QiZURYTth3eF40Wm8n0W5NXYFoMcbC8Y/Ha7sXY0igeL0Lj7Vd1Y 20ujOsqsSdkZAJ6OltqUcwYGEZLzBHbYx9Rnk= Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:21:56 +0100 To: Mel Gorman Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is the change to IDE probing really necessary? Message-ID: <20081125072156.GA3771@gollum.tnic> Reply-To: petkovbb@gmail.com Mail-Followup-To: petkovbb@gmail.com, Mel Gorman , bzolnier@gmail.com, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20081124155632.GE23190@csn.ul.ie> <20081124225139.GA26953@gollum.tnic> <20081125000102.GC8293@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081125000102.GC8293@csn.ul.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: Borislav Petkov Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1361 Lines: 34 [.. ] > > And the probing _is_ done when loaded as a module so the problem is > > not with the mask - in your case the probing will work just fine as > > you need ide0 and ide1, AFAICT. > > Out of curiousity, I loaded ide-generic as a module and tried the suggested > probe_mask. It loads after e100 which is built in and then has a crap attack > as it tries to register IO regions which are already registered, triggers > sysfs warnings for creating duplicate files and then continues along to > a state where networking doesn't work anyway. That suggestion of 0x3f may > still catch someone. Yep, the message could be misleading wrt to the probe_mask. Is something along the lines of "please adjust the probe_mask module parameter for probing the rest of the legacy ISA IDE ports" more informative? Now it implies that the primary/secondary ports are probed by default. However, you still have to set it to something > 0x3 if you want to probe ide[2-5]. Also, there's still the option of CONFIG_BLK_DEV_GENERIC which adds support for otherwise unsupported IDE PCI controllers. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/