Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 03:30:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 03:30:46 -0500 Received: from pcow034o.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.53.122]:42510 "EHLO blueyonder.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 03:30:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:35:29 +0000 From: Ian Molton To: root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: joe.perches@spirentcom.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng Message-Id: <20020208083529.65befc73.spyro@armlinux.org> In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <9384475DFC05D2118F9C00805F6F263107ECA811@exchange1.netcomsystems.com> Reply-To: spyro@armlinux.org Organization: The dragon roost X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On a sunny Thu, 7 Feb 2002 13:08:24 -0500 (EST) Richard B. Johnson gathered a sheaf of electrons and etched in their motions the following immortal words: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Perches, Joe wrote: > [SNIPPED..] > > > That is correct UDP behaviour > > > > Do you think this is the correct PacketSocket/RAW behaviour? > > Yes. > > > How does one guarantee a send/sendto/write? > > - > > Easy, you use send() or write(). These work on stream protocol TCP/IP I know its an extreme case, but consider that something goes wrong and the kernel ends up thinking its buffer is always full / zero lenngth / something horrible. I'd personally like it if it warned me it wasnt even trying to send my packets, rather than just ignoring them completely... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/