Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754031AbYK1JBS (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:01:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752660AbYK1JBE (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:01:04 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:46367 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752618AbYK1JBB (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 04:01:01 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Document hadling of bad memory Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:00:26 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27-7-generic; KDE/4.1.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: kernel list , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, dl9pf@gmx.de, rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Trivial patch monkey References: <20081126161521.GC1983@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20081126161521.GC1983@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811280300.26969.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 687 Lines: 19 On Wednesday 26 November 2008 10:15:21 Pavel Machek wrote: > Document how to deal with bad memory reported with memtest. ... > +BadRAM > +###### > +BadRAM is the actively developed and available as kernel-patch > +here: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ So the patch isn't worth merging, but documentation about the out-of-tree patch is worth merging? I'm not objecting, I'm just confused about to what the merge criteria are... Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/