Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753593AbYK1Kui (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:50:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751691AbYK1Ku3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:50:29 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:50163 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751474AbYK1Ku3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:50:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:49:38 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Balbir Singh , Pavel Emelyanov , Li Zefan , Paul Menage Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mmotm 0/2] misc patches for memory cgroup hierarchy Message-Id: <20081128194938.508a3b22.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20081128180252.b7a73c86.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> References: <20081128180252.b7a73c86.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1565 Lines: 45 On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:02:52 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > Hi. > > I'm writing some patches for memory cgroup hierarchy. > > I think KAMEZAWA-san's cgroup-id patches are the most important pathes now, > but I post these patches as RFC before going further. > Don't wait me ;) I'll rebase mine. > Patch descriptions: > - [1/2] take account of memsw > mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim checks only mem->res now. > It should also check mem->memsw when do_swap_account. > - [2/2] avoid oom > In previous implementation, mem_cgroup_try_charge checked the return > value of mem_cgroup_try_to_free_pages, and just retried if some pages > had been reclaimed. > But now, try_charge(and mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim called from it) > only checks whether the usage is less than the limit. > I see oom easily in some tests which didn't cause oom before. > > Both patches are for memory-cgroup-hierarchical-reclaim-v4 patch series. > > My current plan for memory cgroup hierarchy: > - If hierarchy is enabled, limit of child should not exceed that of parent. limit of a child or limit of sum of children ? > - Change other calls for mem_cgroup_try_to_free_page() to > mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim() if possible. > maybe makes sense. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/