Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:17:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:17:23 -0500 Received: from zikova.cvut.cz ([147.32.235.100]:8205 "EHLO zikova.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 16:17:11 -0500 From: "Petr Vandrovec" Organization: CC CTU Prague To: "David S. Miller" Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 21:46:56 MET-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption CC: viro@math.psu.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@valinux.com X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.40 Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28 Nov 00 at 12:04, David S. Miller wrote: > > Yes, it is identical copy. But I do not think that hdd can write same > data into two places with one command... > > Petr, did the af_inet.c assertions get triggered on this > same machine? No, ext2fs is at home, and af_inet is at work... At work I'm using vmware, at home I do not use it... But kernel sources are same (g450 patch for matroxfb, ncpfs supporting device nodes, threaded ipx; but neither ncpfs nor ipx is compiled at home). Petr Vandrovec vandrove@vc.cvut.cz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/