Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753394AbYLAUy5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:54:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751355AbYLAUys (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:54:48 -0500 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:49778 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbYLAUyr (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:54:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors From: Dave Hansen To: Oren Laadan Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Al Viro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <49344C11.6090204@cs.columbia.edu> References: <1227747884-14150-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <1227747884-14150-10-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <20081128112745.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1228159324.2971.74.camel@nimitz> <49344C11.6090204@cs.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:54:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1228164873.2971.95.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1143 Lines: 30 On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:41 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote: > >>> + fd = cr_attach_file(file); /* no need to cleanup 'file' below */ > >>> + if (fd < 0) { > >>> + filp_close(file, NULL); > >>> + ret = fd; > >>> + goto out; > >>> + } > >>> + > >>> + /* register new tuple in hash table */ > >>> + ret = cr_obj_add_ref(ctx, file, parent, CR_OBJ_FILE, 0); > >>> + if (ret < 0) > >>> + goto out; > >> Who said that file still exists at that point? > > Correct. This call should move higher up befor ethe call to cr_attach_file() Is that sufficient? It seems like we're depending on the fd's reference to the 'struct file' to keep it valid in the hash. If something happens to the fd (like the other thread messing with it) the 'struct file' can still go away. Shouldn't we do another get_file() for the hash's reference? -- Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/