Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753043AbYLBG2o (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:28:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750851AbYLBG2e (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:28:34 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f29.google.com ([209.85.217.29]:59117 "EHLO mail-gx0-f29.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbYLBG2d (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:28:33 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=poSyNO2ee1oEzpdzDJzu1mQexXabp89UCpsJYkQaVQ0tddtEumW6FIrxmSRua6PABJ Id2b++N2Jw/nzcSpmOpFDDVPWxLlDW2C2kDlE8cI+VE3eLpwCZCwirL7XvlIOKtkJlc6 ZWjEQi4mslOri6IF+e8JtGqQvZLIFhSI1rdgY= Message-ID: <5d5443650812012228u5aad36a2jc3e9e68cd61c27e3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:58:31 +0530 From: "Trilok Soni" To: "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" Subject: Re: [PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb Cc: "Hans Verkuil" , "v4l-dvb maintainer list" , v4l , "Sakari Ailus" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20081201202209.5cea1f4b@pedra.chehab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200812011451.06156.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <5d5443650812011014q55a96540gc8a4b97be951f2fd@mail.gmail.com> <20081201202209.5cea1f4b@pedra.chehab.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 31 Hi Mauro, > > This is one of the lack of the features on mercurial. It doesn't have a meta > tag for committer. On mercurial, the -hg user and the author should be the same > person. > > Since we want to identify the patch origin (e.g. whose v4l/dvb maintainer got > the patch), we use the internal "user" meta-tag as the committer, and an extra > tag, at the patch description for the author (From:). > > When creating the -git patch, the "From:" tag is replaced, by script, for > "Author:", I add my SOB there, and, I add myself as the -git committer (on git > we have both meta-tags). Isn't it good time to move v4l2-dvb tree to GIT? I am not aware of any hg-to-git repo. converter, but I can check with hg and git community. It could be difficult at first, but I am very confident that there are many GIT users here than mercurial, and yes your v4l-dvb maintenance process might change due move from GIT, but atleast you will not have to internal user meta-data per patch. -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/