Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755449AbYLBQO6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:14:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752920AbYLBQOs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:14:48 -0500 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.23]:9665 "EHLO mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751979AbYLBQOr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:14:47 -0500 X-Trace: 201576043/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$F2S-NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/f2s-nildram-customers/195.149.44.6/None/alistair@devzero.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 195.149.44.6 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: alistair@devzero.co.uk X-MUA: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28-rc6-damocles; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswEANPtNEnDlSwG/2dsb2JhbACBbdEXgn8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,702,1220223600"; d="scan'208";a="201576043" X-IP-Direction: IN From: Alistair John Strachan To: Alejandro Riveira =?iso-8859-1?q?Fern=E1ndez?= Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc7 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:14:44 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28-rc6-damocles; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: pazke , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200812021520.25856.alistair@devzero.co.uk> <20081202165047.3d09bf43@varda> In-Reply-To: <20081202165047.3d09bf43@varda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812021614.44594.alistair@devzero.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 27 On Tuesday 02 December 2008 15:50:47 Alejandro Riveira Fern?ndez wrote: > El Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:20:25 +0000 > > Alistair John Strachan escribi?: > > (Maybe things have changed over the years, but my understanding was that > > for the majority of Xorg drivers, mode setting was still done by the Xorg > > driver, not the kernel, and the X server is responsible for restoring the > > VT correctly, not the kernel's framebuffer driver. So this may possibly > > not be a kernel bug at all.) > > Given that this is easily reproducible i may try to biect rc6 <--> rc7... > it may take a few days though Definitely a good course of action. Hardly anything in rc7, and if the bug really is that localised that's good news. The only frame-buffer commit in rc7 was bca404afdc5206c3bb but this looks unrelated. -- Cheers, Alistair. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/