Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755815AbYLBQ6k (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:58:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753240AbYLBQ6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:58:31 -0500 Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.171]:3373 "EHLO mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487AbYLBQ6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:58:30 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswEAF/4NEnCTsYx/2dsb2JhbACBbdB1gn8 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:58:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Hans Verkuil , video4linux-list@redhat.com, "v4l-dvb maintainer list" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@linux.davincidsp.com References: <200812011246.08885.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <200812011524.43499.laurent.pinchart@skynet.be> <20081201130643.661f5743@pedra.chehab.org> In-Reply-To: <20081201130643.661f5743@pedra.chehab.org> X-Face: 4Mf^tnii7k\_EnR5aobBm6Di[DZ9@AX1wJ"okBdX-UoJ>:SRn]c6DDU"qUIwfs98vF>=?utf-8?q?Tnf=0A=09SacR=7B?=(0Du"N%_.#X]"TXx)A'gKB1i7SK$CTLuy{h})c=g:'w3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812021758.35503.laurent.pinchart@skynet.be> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1841 Lines: 51 Hi Mauro, On Monday 01 December 2008, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:24:43 +0100 > > Laurent Pinchart wrote: [snip] > > In a few months time (probably even earlier) the v4l2_device structure > > will be reworked (and possible renamed). > > Hmm... why? it would be better to try to have the KABI changes for it at > the same kernel release if possible. Because Hans is working on more changes. > > I'm fine with it going to linux-next now if > > we agree on the following. > > > > - We should only advocate v4l2_device usage for subdevices-aware video > > devices. Porting all drivers to v4l2_device is currently pointless and > > will only make future transitions more difficult. > > This makes sense to me. > > > - v4l2_device should be marked as experimental. I don't want to hear any > > API/ABI breakage argument in a few months time when the framework will > > evolve. > > Are you meaning marking this as experimental at Kconfig? This seems too > complex, since we'll need to test for some var on every driver that were > converted, providing two KABI options for each converted driver (the legacy > and the v4l2_device way). This doesn't seem to be a good idea, since will > add a lot of extra complexity to debug bugs. Not at the Kconfig level, just in the documentation (and possible headers). This is a work in progress. Hans wants the changes to go mainline to get broader testing, which is a valid reason, but I'd like to make sure people understand that more changes are coming. Best regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/