Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755910AbYLBR0t (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:26:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754004AbYLBR0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:26:39 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.24]:1149 "EHLO smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbYLBR0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:26:38 -0500 From: Hans Verkuil To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PULL] http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:26:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Laurent Pinchart , video4linux-list@redhat.com, "v4l-dvb maintainer list" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@linux.davincidsp.com References: <200812011246.08885.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <200812021758.35503.laurent.pinchart@skynet.be> <20081202152100.0a4dd2c1@pedra.chehab.org> In-Reply-To: <20081202152100.0a4dd2c1@pedra.chehab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812021826.09133.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 42 On Tuesday 02 December 2008 18:21:00 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:58:35 +0100 > > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > Are you meaning marking this as experimental at Kconfig? This > > > seems too complex, since we'll need to test for some var on every > > > driver that were converted, providing two KABI options for each > > > converted driver (the legacy and the v4l2_device way). This > > > doesn't seem to be a good idea, since will add a lot of extra > > > complexity to debug bugs. > > > > Not at the Kconfig level, just in the documentation (and possible > > headers). > > Ah, ok. Good point. > > > This is a work in progress. Hans wants the changes to go mainline > > to get broader testing, which is a valid reason, but I'd like to > > make sure people understand that more changes are coming. > > Maybe instead we should have a TODO list somewhere with the > programmed changes, especially at the subsystem core. Sure, I can add some comments outlining future developments in v4l2-device.h and v4l2-subdev.h. The v4l2-framework document can point to those headers (headers are easier to keep in sync when new features arrive than documentation). But I'll wait with this until I get Mauro's review back, just in case there are more changes for me to do. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/