Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:21:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:21:38 -0500 Received: from pc1-camc5-0-cust78.cam.cable.ntl.com ([80.4.0.78]:34522 "EHLO amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:21:32 -0500 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 22:20:37 +0000 (GMT) From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl To: carson@antd.nist.gov (Mark E. Carson) Subject: Re: What "module license" applies to public domain code? cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-6.0.1 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: > Of course, anyone else would be free to take the code and apply any > license whatsoever to it, but my concern is simply what MODULE_LICENSE() > line I can legitimately include, if any. how about MODULE_LICENSE("Dual GPL/Public Domain"); this would need adding to the proper headers though - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/