Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760425AbYLCUX7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:23:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756094AbYLCT5v (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:57:51 -0500 Received: from victor.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.26]:38100 "EHLO victor.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754354AbYLCT5q (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:57:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4936E587.40700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:01:11 -0500 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Haskins CC: mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description References: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net> In-Reply-To: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 797 Lines: 19 Gregory Haskins wrote: > Hi Ingo, Steven, Peter, > This series applies roughly to mainline as an enhancement to the sched_rt > logic. Peter and I were discussing some of the unecessary overhead in > pull_rt_tasks() via IRC, and this is my RFC attempt to address the problem. > Hi Ingo, I was putting together a refresh of this patch and I rebased on tip/sched/devel. I noticed that sched/devel is on 27-rc8, which is obviously a little stale. Is this the proper tree to send patches against, or would you prefer a different HEAD? -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/