Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756745AbYLCXi5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:38:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752752AbYLCXiq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:38:46 -0500 Received: from rcsinet13.oracle.com ([148.87.113.125]:61062 "EHLO rgminet13.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106AbYLCXip (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:38:45 -0500 Message-ID: <49371848.2080804@oracle.com> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:37:44 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Andrew Morton , Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Yet more ARM breakage in linux-next References: <20081203192905.GA12502@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20081203124109.79f8f15b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200812040952.44957.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200812040952.44957.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt707.oracle.com [141.146.40.85] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010202.4937184C.0085:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1803 Lines: 55 Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thursday 04 December 2008 07:11:09 Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:29:05 +0000 >> >> Russell King wrote: >>> This seems to be causing lots of ARM breakage: >>> >>> lib/find_next_bit.c:183: error: implicit declaration of function '__fls' >>> >>> Whoever's responsible, >> git-blame? > > It's me. Turns out sparc, avr32 and arm all don't define __fls in their > asm/bitops.h, and I'm the first one to use it in generic code. > > But as I prepared this patch, I note that the armv5 __fls/fls is wrong: > > /* Implement fls() in C so that 64-bit args are suitably truncated */ > static inline int fls(int x) > { > return __fls(x); > } > > __fls(x) returns a bit number (0-31). fls() returns 0 or bitnumber+1. > > (Yes, classic useless kerneldoc documentation doesn't actually *say* > this clearly). oh fud. That's not a fault of kernel-doc, just of whoever wrote it. It's only as good as someone makes it. > But here's the linux-next fix: > > arm: define __fls for pre v5 ARM > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h > @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ extern int _find_next_bit_be(const unsig > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #else -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/