Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758142AbYLDBGx (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:06:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757388AbYLDBGb (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:06:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59255 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757354AbYLDBG3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 20:06:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Alan Stern Cc: prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 6/9] Use virtual debug registers in process/thread handling code In-Reply-To: Alan Stern's message of Saturday, 18 October 2008 11:34:56 -0400 References: <20081018000829.519111544CB@magilla.localdomain> X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus X-Windows: simplicity made complex. Message-Id: <20081204010559.AAB5DFC053@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 17:05:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 794 Lines: 20 > > Hmm. The 64-bit version of __switch_to does the current change much > > earlier, before __switch_to_xtra and math_state_restore. I wonder if the > > 32-bit version could change to match. I can't see what in __switch_to_xtra > > would care either way, though I may be overlooking something. Ingo? > > Would it be better to move __switch_to_xtra down below the change to > current, rather than moving the change to current up above > __switch_to_xtra? I can't see that anything else in __switch_to_xtra cares either way. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/