Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:05:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:05:12 -0500 Received: from smtp3.vol.cz ([195.250.128.83]:64780 "EHLO smtp3.vol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:05:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:00:58 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: James Bottomley Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: [PATCH: NEW ARCHITECTURE FOR 2.5.3] support for NCR voyager Message-ID: <20020209180057.GB113@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <200202081825.g18IPSf03107@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200202081825.g18IPSf03107@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > This is essentially the same as the 2.5.2 patch except that it adds support > for the new migration cross processor interrupt. > > As far as the new scheduler goes, the process affinity properties are much > better for the voyager, which is configured to have a fairly huge L3 cache > shared by several CPUs. (My current voyager has 2 CPU cards with 4 pentium > CPUs each and 32Mb of L3 cache on each card). Maybe you should stop calling it new architecture? Its mostly i386-compatible, right? BTW are those "current" machines, or is their production already stopped? Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/