Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:24:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:24:47 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:61449 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:24:27 -0500 Message-ID: <3C658566.2020603@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 12:24:06 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] BUG preserve registers In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Oh, but I was talking about the case of the macro being used in an "static > inline" in a header file, and that inline is not actually _used_ > anywhere.. > Ah... but it was talked about in reference to a macro. Also, since AFAIK BUG() never returns, you may want to have it end with for(;;); to let gcc know that any code downstream of a BUG() is dead. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/