Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:50:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:49:57 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:1678 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:49:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:49:39 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Stelian Pop Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: pull vs push (was Re: [bk patch] Make cardbus compile in -pre4) Message-ID: <20020209154939.D18734@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Stelian Pop , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger In-Reply-To: <20020209181213.GA32401@come.alcove-fr> <20020209201252.GD32401@come.alcove-fr> <20020209122649.E13735@work.bitmover.com> <20020209205110.GE32401@come.alcove-fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020209205110.GE32401@come.alcove-fr>; from stelian.pop@fr.alcove.com on Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:51:10PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:51:10PM +0100, Stelian Pop wrote: > Would it be possible to do something to keep the 2.4 tree up to date too ? > (something like checking if the latest incremental patch from kernel.org > was applied to the tree, and if not, apply it as a changeset and tag) ? Someone has to do the work, it's certainly possible. That tree is up to date with what Linus has done. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/