Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753208AbYLFTJl (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:09:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752079AbYLFTJc (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:09:32 -0500 Received: from flock1.newmail.ru ([82.204.219.207]:44463 "HELO flock1.newmail.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751542AbYLFTJb (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 14:09:31 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 414 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:09:30 EST From: Andrey Borzenkov To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: Is vm86old no more implemented? Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:02:29 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.90 (Linux/2.6.28-rc7-1avb; KDE/4.1.81; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200812061043.51438.arvidjaar@mail.ru> <200812061252.51173.arvidjaar@mail.ru> <20081206102047.GG6703@one.firstfloor.org> In-Reply-To: <20081206102047.GG6703@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8141827.tHInVu7m4H"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200812062202.30476.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2227 Lines: 60 --nextPart8141827.tHInVu7m4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On =D0=A1=D1=83=D0=B1=D0=B1=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B0 06 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0=B0= =D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2008 13:20:47 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:52:43PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > On =D0=A1=D1=83=D0=B1=D0=B1=D0=BE=D1=82=D0=B0 06 =D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=BA=D0= =B0=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2008 11:56:03 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Andrey Borzenkov writes: > > > > CONFIG_VM86 is defined; is there anything else that is needed? > > > > This fails both in 2.6.27.7 and in 2.6.28-rc7. I attach config > > > > from 2.6.28-rc7. > > > > > > It should still work. Can you double check you're running the > > > correct kernel? Perhaps a 64bit kernel (which doesn't implement > > > it). > > > > Linux cooker 2.6.28-rc7-1avb #23 Fri Dec 5 22:42:47 MSK 2008 i686 > > Pentium III (Coppermine) GNU/Linux > > > > Anything else I can check? > > Hmm perhaps place a printk into > arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c:sys_vm86old() and see if it's reached. > It is: [ 156.094049] sys_vm86old called by monitor-get-edi [ 156.243660] sys_vm86old called by monitor-get-edi [ 285.698333] sys_vm86old called by X [ 285.699408] sys_vm86old called by X [ 285.699813] sys_vm86old called by X any chance the specific function that is invoked is not implemented?=20 Because at least X apparently does not always fail video BIOS call - how=20 can I catch which calls were successful and which failed? I understand=20 return path sys_vm86old is rather non-standard. --nextPart8141827.tHInVu7m4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk6zEYACgkQR6LMutpd94y2BwCgvaUWkuEVwruJLAlaxvXNf2LO 1mYAnAjiD0plRbeGKjmmO1jNCJcosvXZ =MbbH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8141827.tHInVu7m4H-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/