Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754850AbYLGMsV (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 07:48:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753884AbYLGMsH (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 07:48:07 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:33584 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753817AbYLGMsE (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 07:48:04 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend and resume Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:47:18 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Jesse Barnes , Len Brown , LKML , Takashi Iwai , Andrew Morton , pm list References: <200812020320.31876.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081207054149.GA20415@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20081207054149.GA20415@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812071347.18608.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1551 Lines: 36 On Sunday, 7 of December 2008, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 10:00:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > So, to fix the issue at hand, I'd like the $subject patch to go first. Then, > > > there is a major update of the new framework waiting for .29 in the Greg's > > > tree (that's the main reason why nobody uses it so far, BTW) and I'd really > > > prefer it to go next. After it's been merged, I'm going to add the mandatory > > > suspend-resume things (save state and go to a low power state on suspend, > > > restore state on resume) to the new framework in a separete patch. > > > > > > Is this plan acceptable? > > > > Sounds good to me. And assuming Jesse/Greg are all aboard, I'll just wait > > for the pull requests from Jesse and Greg. > > No objection from me, I'll wait for Jesse to "go first" in the .29 merge > window. Unfortunately, the merge of the $subject patch with the one in your tree results in code that doesn't compile. Namely, some lines of code that the $subject patch relies on are removed by the patch in your tree. If there is no objection from Jesse and if you don't mind, I'll prepare a version of the $subject patch on top of the patch in your tree and send it to you. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/