Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755249AbYLGRcY (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:32:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751250AbYLGRcQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:32:16 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:44640 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202AbYLGRcP (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:32:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 09:26:42 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Jesse Barnes , Len Brown , LKML , Takashi Iwai , Andrew Morton , pm list Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Rework default handling of suspend and resume Message-ID: <20081207172642.GC23744@kroah.com> References: <200812020320.31876.rjw@sisk.pl> <20081207054149.GA20415@kroah.com> <200812071347.18608.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812071347.18608.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1697 Lines: 40 On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:47:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 7 of December 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 10:00:35AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > So, to fix the issue at hand, I'd like the $subject patch to go first. Then, > > > > there is a major update of the new framework waiting for .29 in the Greg's > > > > tree (that's the main reason why nobody uses it so far, BTW) and I'd really > > > > prefer it to go next. After it's been merged, I'm going to add the mandatory > > > > suspend-resume things (save state and go to a low power state on suspend, > > > > restore state on resume) to the new framework in a separete patch. > > > > > > > > Is this plan acceptable? > > > > > > Sounds good to me. And assuming Jesse/Greg are all aboard, I'll just wait > > > for the pull requests from Jesse and Greg. > > > > No objection from me, I'll wait for Jesse to "go first" in the .29 merge > > window. > > Unfortunately, the merge of the $subject patch with the one in your tree > results in code that doesn't compile. Namely, some lines of code that the > $subject patch relies on are removed by the patch in your tree. > > If there is no objection from Jesse and if you don't mind, I'll prepare a > version of the $subject patch on top of the patch in your tree and send it to > you. I sure don't mind. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/