Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753807AbYLHQcr (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:32:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753277AbYLHQcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:32:39 -0500 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:57128 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753269AbYLHQci (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:32:38 -0500 Message-ID: <493D4C1B.4030006@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:32:27 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 SeaMonkey/1.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Holger Hoffstaette , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: Nasty regression from .27.7 to .27.8: idle samba goes crazy References: <200812080834.22924.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200812080834.22924.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 20 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Please bisect. Why should he bisect before the developers who added networking related patches to .8 attempted to reproduce the bug, let alone looked at the report? Actually he "bisected" it already to the diff of .7->.8. (Maybe it is not a networking bug, but that's where it makes most sense to start to look.) -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ==-- -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/