Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754042AbYLHXBT (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:01:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752565AbYLHXBD (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:01:03 -0500 Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:50779 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042AbYLHXBC (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:01:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:00:47 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , linux kernel , "David S. Miller" , Mingming Cao , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu_counter: Fix __percpu_counter_sum() Message-ID: <20081208230047.GC2501@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Eric Dumazet , linux kernel , "David S. Miller" , Mingming Cao , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <4936D287.6090206@cosmosbay.com> <4936EB04.8000609@cosmosbay.com> <20081206202233.3b74febc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <493BCF60.1080409@cosmosbay.com> <20081207092854.f6bcbfae.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <493C0F40.7040304@cosmosbay.com> <20081207205250.dbb7fe4b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081208221241.GA2501@mit.edu> <1228774836.16244.22.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1228774836.16244.22.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 727 Lines: 19 On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 11:20:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > atomic_t is pretty good on all archs, but you get to keep the cacheline > ping-pong. > Stupid question --- if you're worried about cacheline ping-pongs, why aren't each cpu's delta counter cacheline aligned? With a 64-byte cache-line, and a 32-bit counters entry, with less than 16 CPU's we're going to be getting cache ping-pong effects with percpu_counter's, right? Or am I missing something? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/