Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:06:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:06:32 -0500 Received: from north.net.CSUChico.EDU ([132.241.66.18]:20232 "EHLO north.net.csuchico.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 19:06:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 15:36:15 -0800 From: John Kennedy To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] blindingly stupid 2.2 VM bug Message-ID: <20001128153615.E7323@north.csuchico.edu> In-Reply-To: <20001119100100.A54301@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <20001124152831.A5696@valinux.com> <20001125145701.A12719@athlon.random> <20001128150235.A7323@north.csuchico.edu> <20001129002009.I14675@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001129002009.I14675@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:20:09AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:20:09AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:02:35PM -0800, John Kennedy wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 02:57:01PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > ... VM-global-*-7 has no known bugs AFIK. > > > > Is there anything more recent than VM-global-2.2.18pre18-7? It isn't > > patching very cleanly against my pre-patch-2.2.18-23 tree. > > It patches cleanly for me. (ignore the offset warnings from patch, just make > sure there are no rejects) No, it is all ext3fs stuff that is touching the same areas your patch is. Sorry. I was assuming that Rik van Riel's comments implied that they should get patch a lot more cleanly and that I might have missed a version, but there is no way these two could patch without rejects along as-is. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/