Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755349AbYLIUva (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:51:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752907AbYLIUvS (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:51:18 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:45565 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752780AbYLIUvR (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:51:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:49:32 -0500 From: Chuck Ebbert To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Pekka Enberg" , "Dennis Hardy" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, layton@redhat.com, "Steven French" , "Greg KH" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Holger Hoffstaette , Stefan Richter Subject: Re: CIFS regression in 2.6.27.8 Message-ID: <20081209154932.0952fbf3@dhcp-100-2-144.bos.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200812082112.49468.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <20900699.post@talk.nabble.com> <84144f020812081128p6d1e2a55v69996a360e7f0e8f@mail.gmail.com> <200812082112.49468.rjw@sisk.pl> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1312 Lines: 31 On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:12:48 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Monday, 8 of December 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dennis Hardy wrote: > > > I just mounted a network drive (Windows Server) via CIFS under 2.6.27.8, and > > > the sizes reported by "df" are completely incorrect: > > > > > > root@exodus:~# df -h /mnt/fsv1 > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > > //fsv1/Users 446G -222G 667G - /mnt/fsv1 > > > root@exodus:~# df /mnt/fsv1 > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > > > //fsv1/Users 467403140 -231816588 699219728 - /mnt/fsv1 > > > root@exodus:~# mount | grep fsv1 > > > //fsv1/Users on /mnt/fsv1 type cifs (rw,mand) > > > root@exodus:~# > > > > > > Does anyone else see this sort of behavior with 2.6.27.8? This worked fine > > > in 2.6.27.6 (we skipped 2.6.27.7)... > > > I tried it on both i386 and x86_64 and had no problems. Is this client non-x86 by any chance? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/