Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S284144AbSBJWRj>; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:17:39 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S284300AbSBJWR2>; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:17:28 -0500
Received: from gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de ([139.30.44.2]:48394 "EHLO
	gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S284144AbSBJWRN>; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:17:13 -0500
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:17:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@suse.de>
cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][looking for maintainers] jiffies compare fixups
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202102137560.29486-100000@Appserv.suse.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202102308070.31683-100000@gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Tim Schmielau wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, about the same fraction of the mails weren't replied
> > to, while these patches also haven't yet appeared in Marcelo's tree.
>
> Your pine seems to be eating trailing whitespace making a lot of these
> not apply. This could be one of the reasons why they haven't been
> accepted either by the maintainer, or marcelo/linus.
>

Just to set the record straight: I was not complaining about Marcelo or
Linus. Marcelo did apply the (maintainer approved) patches I sent directly
to him to the next prerelease, while I have not yet submitted any patches
to Linus for 2.5.

Tim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/