Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, mingo@redhat.com, weidong.han@intel.com,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20081210141131.GB12816@amd.com>
References: <20081209141143.GW12816@amd.com> <493F8D90.40205@redhat.com>
	 <20081210141131.GB12816@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:22:08 +0000
Message-Id: <1228918928.21454.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1027
Lines: 24

On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge it in
> three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my IOMMU
> updates which has to happen in that order).
> The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send to
> Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all these
> changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master.
> Is this acceptable for everyone?
> 
> David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this single
> pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued in your
> tree? Is this ok for you?

Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's patch
set from Monday first? Or just let you do that?

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/