Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754932AbYLJOZw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:25:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752198AbYLJOZm (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:25:42 -0500 Received: from outbound-sin.frontbridge.com ([207.46.51.80]:21652 "EHLO SG2EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751604AbYLJOZl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:25:41 -0500 X-BigFish: VPS-37(zba6iz1432R98dR936eQ1805M936fOzzzzz32i6bh43j61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-WSS-ID: 0KBO02D-04-WVJ-01 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:25:25 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: David Woodhouse CC: Avi Kivity , mingo@redhat.com, weidong.han@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU Message-ID: <20081210142525.GC12816@amd.com> References: <20081209141143.GW12816@amd.com> <493F8D90.40205@redhat.com> <20081210141131.GB12816@amd.com> <1228918928.21454.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1228918928.21454.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2008 14:25:25.0612 (UTC) FILETIME=[24A45AC0:01C95AD3] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1693 Lines: 36 On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge it in > > three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my IOMMU > > updates which has to happen in that order). > > The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send to > > Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all these > > changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master. > > Is this acceptable for everyone? > > > > David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this single > > pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued in your > > tree? Is this ok for you? > > Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's patch > set from Monday first? Or just let you do that? I already did it on-top of your tree because Han Weidong's patches 1-17 were rebased to your tree and my IOMMU-API patches apply on-top of his patches. Joerg -- | AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896 Research | General Partner authorized to represent: Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US) | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/