Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:44:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:44:38 -0500 Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de ([131.159.0.5]:59318 "EHLO mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:44:25 -0500 Subject: pci_pool reap? From: Daniel Stodden To: Linux Kernel Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uD6v9UepdAfDo1GC0gD+" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2 Date: 11 Feb 2002 01:44:13 +0100 Message-Id: <1013388253.15449.12.camel@bitch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-uD6v9UepdAfDo1GC0gD+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi. is it true that pci pools are never shrunk? or am i just missing the point where it happens? try_to_free_pages() seems to care just about kmem_caches. looks odd to me... thanx, dns --=20 ___________________________________________________________________________ mailto:stodden@in.tum.de --=-uD6v9UepdAfDo1GC0gD+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8ZxPdSPSplX5M5nQRAgkjAJ9X+qDkiywiggSmrGj19r2r85g39wCgtcXx wkfr03d1fxQYKGPpjx4Iols= =C2DB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uD6v9UepdAfDo1GC0gD+-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/