Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755576AbYLKBL5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:11:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753824AbYLKBLq (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:11:46 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:35279 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753192AbYLKBLp convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:11:45 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,749,1220252400"; d="scan'208";a="413394097" From: "Han, Weidong" To: "'Joerg Roedel'" , "'David Woodhouse'" CC: "'Avi Kivity'" , "'mingo@redhat.com'" , "'torvalds@linux-foundation.org'" , "'iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'kvm@vger.kernel.org'" Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:11:21 +0800 Subject: RE: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU Thread-Topic: [PATCHSETS #2] KVM device passthrough support with AMD IOMMU Thread-Index: Acla0z4qBZZ0fCqVQ7a70Oype6ZivQAWgUWA Message-ID: <715D42877B251141A38726ABF5CABF2C018E6FAE6E@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20081209141143.GW12816@amd.com> <493F8D90.40205@redhat.com> <20081210141131.GB12816@amd.com> <1228918928.21454.27.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20081210142525.GC12816@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20081210142525.GC12816@amd.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1360 Lines: 32 Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: >>> So now its open how this will be merged alltogether. We can merge >>> it in three steps (first from Dave's tree, then Avi and at last my >>> IOMMU updates which has to happen in that order). >>> The other option is to merge this all with one pull-request I send >>> to Linus. It should not conflict with your updates Avi because all >>> these changes apply also cleanly to current linus/master. >>> Is this acceptable for everyone? >>> >>> David, its important to hear your opinion on that because this >>> single pull-request would include all VT-d updates you have queued >>> in your tree? Is this ok for you? >> >> Yes, that's fine by me. Should I apply patches 1-14 of Weidong's >> patch set from Monday first? Or just let you do that? > > I already did it on-top of your tree because Han Weidong's patches > 1-17 were rebased to your tree and my IOMMU-API patches apply on-top > of his patches. > > Joerg It's good. Thanks Dave and Joerg. Regards, Weidong-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/